Standard Newswire is a cost-effective and efficient newswire service for public policy groups, government agencies, PR firms, think-tanks, watchdog groups, advocacy groups, coalitions, foundations, colleges, universities, activists, politicians, and candidates to distribute their press releases to journalists who truly want to hear from them.
Do not settle for an email blasting service or a newswire overloaded with financial statements. Standard Newswire gets your news into the hands of working journalists, broadcast hosts, and news producers.
Find out how you can start using Standard Newswire to
Do not settle for an email blasting service or a newswire overloaded with financial statements. Standard Newswire gets your news into the hands of working journalists, broadcast hosts, and news producers.
Find out how you can start using Standard Newswire to
Sign Up to Receive Press Releases:
Standard Newswire™ LLC
209 W. 29th Street, Suite 6202
New York, NY 10001, USA.
(212) 290-1585
Judicial Watch and Allied Educational Foundation File Amici Brief, Ask U.S. Supreme Court to Overturn Texas Voting Districting
Texas Districting Law Dilutes Citizen Votes
Contact: Jill Farrell, Judicial Watch, 202-646-5188
WASHINGTON, Aug. 12, 2015 /Standard Newswire/ -- Judicial Watch and the Allied Educational Foundation (AEF) announced today that they filed an amici curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court in support of Sue Evenwel, a Texas resident, due to concerns with "malapportionment" in a Texas election districting law that weakens the voting rights of citizens by including nonvoting noncitizens in districts (Sue Evenwel, et al. v. Greg Abbott, et al. (No. 14-940). The Supreme Court brief was filed on August 7.
The Texas districting law draws up districts for the Texas state senate based upon total population rather than the number of eligible voters. As a result, voters in districts with large numbers of non-voting-eligible aliens have increased voting and political power compared to voters in districts with higher numbers of legal residents. Voters in Texas' urban centers have substantially inflated voting power over the lesser number of eligible voters who also reside in those districts. The situation is particularly acute in urban areas like Dallas and Houston, where up to 50 percent of the voting age population are not U.S. citizens.
The Judicial Watch-AEF brief argues that the districting law almost cuts in half the voting power of some Texas citizens:
Texas created districts that are equal in total population but decidedly unequal in citizen population. As a result, the votes of some of Texas' citizens have, by some measures, almost twice the electoral power of the votes of other Texas citizens …
Texas' legislators … argue that they are complying with the constitutional, "one person, one vote," requirement, at the very moment that they are "weighting" the votes of their supporters by placing them in districts with greater numbers of nonvoting noncitizens. The ultimate consequence of this scheme is that legislators are able to enhance their odds of winning reelection without having to engage in the bothersome and time-consuming task of actually persuading voters to vote for them.
In June 2014, Texas citizens Sue Evenwel and Edward Pfenninger filed a lawsuit suit arguing that the law violated the "one person, one vote" clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. On November 5, 2014 a special panel of three federal court judges dismissed the suit, and on December 4, 2014, Evenwel and Pfenninger filed their notice of appeal to the Supreme Court. On March 6, 2015 Judicial Watch and AEF filed an amici brief in support of what turned out to be a successful effort to persuade the Supreme Court to take up the lawsuit.
