NEWS PROVIDED BY
Righteous PR Agency
July 10, 2025

ATLANTA, July 10, 2025 /Standard Newswire/ --  VoterGA co-founder Ricardo Davis yesterday appealed an inexplicable U.S. District Court dismissal of Plaintiffs claims in the case known as Curling v. Raffensperger. The case involves the question of whether or not Georgia’s voting system is constitutionally deficient. Judge Amy Totenberg abruptly ruled on March 31, 2025, that all plaintiffs, including Davis, no longer had standing to pursue their claims.

Federal courts have made numerous rulings in the Plaintiffs’ favor over the life of the case which originated in 2017. Rulings that confirmed the Plaintiffs’ standing include:

● Totenberg’s August 15, 2019 Order;

● An 11th Circuit Court of Appeals denial on February 7, 2019, of a challenge to all Plaintiffs’ standing;

● Totenberg’s 37-page analysis confirming Plaintiffs’ standing in an October 11, 2023 order that initiated a three-week trial in January 2024.

Davis got the dismissal news the next day, April 1, and said: “I thought it was an April Fool’s joke.” He added: “But more unprecedented was the way I was prevented before and during trial from presenting my case. The court rejected my original attorney and did not allow me to call any witnesses. Even the Defendants agreed I was entitled to the attorney of my choice.”

The Davis appeal counters Totenberg’s decision that Plaintiffs’ claims were speculative and did not represent a cognizable injury to a legally protected interest with three basic arguments:

● The court erred in finding Plaintiffs no longer had standing since they had no change in status over the 7-year life of the case and standing was already determined years earlier;

● Davis presented legally cognizable injuries to justify pursuing his claims such as inaccurate election results, system malfunctions and negligence by the Defendants;

● The court abused its discretion by denying Davis the attorney of his choice, the ability to call rebuttal witnesses and previously deposed witnesses, to fully question Defendant witnesses and Plaintiffs’ experts and to designate deposition transcripts for the record.

Attorney David Oles, who argued valiantly for Davis, explained: “Ricardo Davis tried for seven years to show evidence of real problems in the Dominion Voting System.  He was denied his day in court when that evidence was excluded.” Garland Favorito, who attended trial each day as a Davis advisor, added: “It was the most judicially dishonest decision I have ever seen.

SOURCE Righteous PR Agency

CONTACT: Sheryl Sellaway, 404-273-5133, sheryl@righteouspragency.com